NetEnt vs Microgaming: RTP vs Volatility Comparison

Introduction

NetEnt and Microgaming are two of the oldest and most influential providers of gaming software. Their games are in demand in Australia to this day, but the differences between them are noticeable especially in indicators such as RTP (return to player) and volatility (risk/win size). These parameters directly affect the gaming experience and betting strategy.

1. RTP: Return to player in slots

NetEnt:

• The average RTP for most NetEnt slots is in the range of 96-97%.
Cult examples:
• *Starburst— 96,1%
• * Blood Suckers - 98% (one of the highest in the industry)
• *Dead or Alive 2— 96,8%

A feature of NetEnt is stability: the developer rarely drops below 95%. RTP is often fixed, which creates trust among players.

Microgaming:
• Indicators are more diverse - from 94% to 97%.
Examples:
• *Thunderstruck II— 96,6%
• *Immortal Romance— 96,9%
• * Mega Moolah - about 88-93% (below average due to progressive jackpot).

Microgaming is known for having a lower RTP than classic progressive jackpot games, which is offset by the chance of a multi-million dollar win.

RTP conclusion: NetEnt is on average more stable and generous with returns, but Microgaming gives a chance for giant wins with lower base payments.

2. Volatility: Risk and size of winnings

NetEnt:
• More often produces slots with medium or high volatility.

* Gonzo's Quest is average, designed for smooth gameplay.
* Dead or Alive 2 - extremely high, huge drifts, but rare.
Thus, NetEnt is focused on balance: both beginner players and high rollers.

Microgaming:
• Known for a wide range of volatility.

* Immortal Romance is medium-high, with long sessions and rare big wins.
* Mega Moolah - high volatility where jackpot odds are minimal but potential win amount could be life-changing
In the Microgaming line, slots with extreme volatility are more common, attracting risk-takers.

Conclusion on volatility: Microgaming is more focused on risky gamblers and jackpot hunters, whereas NetEnt offers a more balanced experience.

3. Approach to players in Australia

NetEnt gives players more predictable results, which is suitable for long gaming sessions and budget control.
Microgaming is attractive to those looking for extreme emotions and rare but huge winnings, especially in progressive slots.

4. Final comparison



Parameter	NetEnt	Microgaming
Average RTP	96-97%	94-96%, jackpots below
Volatility	Medium and high, more balanced	High, often extreme
Forte	Stability and Integrity of Payouts	Progressive Jackpots
Minus	Fewer "super jackpots"	Below RTP for many iconic games


Conclusion

If the player's goal is long-term stability and high RTP, the choice falls on NetEnt. But if the priority is a chance to hit the largest jackpot, despite low RTP and high volatility, then Microgaming is the best choice. For Australian gamblers, these differences help guide strategy: playing conservatively through NetEnt or gamely seeking record winnings through Microgaming.